Type a tool name, for example "keyword density" or "transcript".
Check the spam score of any domain to evaluate link quality.
A spam score checker helps you judge whether a domain looks trustworthy before you link to it, buy it or accept links from it. This free tool reads a domain's address, mail and email-authentication records and shows each signal as Good or Warning in a table. It does not return a percentage score.
A spam score in SEO is a risk estimate of how likely a domain is to be low quality or penalized. SEO software usually builds one by checking many traits of a site and its links, then comparing them with sites that search engines have penalized or removed. Moz made the idea popular with a percentage, and many people now use the phrase for any domain-level risk signal.
Two points are worth knowing. A spam score is a third-party estimate, not a Google metric, and Google's Search Central documentation does not describe a score you can look up. Treat any spam score as a reason to investigate a domain, never as a final verdict.
This tool checks four technical signals that any public domain exposes: whether it resolves to an address, whether it advertises a mail server, and whether it publishes SPF and DMARC email-authentication policies. Each one appears as a row with a status and a plain-language detail.
| Signal | Shown as Good when | Shown as Warning when |
|---|---|---|
| Address (A record) | The domain resolves to an IP address | No address is found, so the domain may be parked or inactive |
| MX record | A mail server is listed | No incoming mail server is listed |
| SPF record | An SPF policy is published | No SPF policy is found |
| DMARC record | A DMARC policy is published | No DMARC policy is found |
If a domain has no address record but does have an IPv6 record, the tool shows that as Good, because IPv6-only hosting is valid.
Above the table, the result is labeled DNS and mail observations, followed by a short note. That note is honest about scope: these records do not measure backlink spam, search penalties or website trust. Mail records are also optional for sites that never send or receive email, so a Warning is a prompt to look closer, not proof of a problem.
You can run a check in under a minute by entering one domain and reading the table that comes back.
example.com. If you paste a full URL, the tool keeps only the domain part and drops the path, query and fragment.The same four checks can tell very different stories depending on the domain. Take a small online shop called harborcandles.com, which offered you a guest post.
The table shows an address record that resolves to an IP, a mail server, and an SPF record, all Good. DMARC shows a Warning. That pattern describes an ordinary active business that sends email but has not finished its email authentication. It says nothing bad about the site's link quality, so you would move on to judging the content and audience.
Now take cheap-links-hub.net, a domain that emailed you an offer. The checker returns a Warning for the missing address record, plus Warnings for missing MX, SPF and DMARC. The domain does not point anywhere, advertises no mail and publishes no policies. It may be parked, expired or abandoned. Before you accept a link or a payment, open the domain in a browser and check who is behind it.
Read the table as a quick technical health check, then act on each Warning according to whose domain it is and what you plan to do with it.
This is the most meaningful row for link vetting. A domain with no address is not serving a website, so a link from it cannot be crawled. If it is your own domain, check your DNS settings and your registrar. If it belongs to someone else, skip it.
These matter most for email deliverability. If you own the domain and send email, ask your email provider for the exact SPF entry and add it. A common way to start with DMARC is a monitoring-only policy, which lets you see who sends mail as your domain before you enforce anything. If the site never handles email, you can reasonably leave these alone.
Four Good rows mean the domain is configured like a normal, maintained one. They do not mean its backlinks are clean or its content is worthwhile. Anyone can set up these records in minutes, including spammers.
It fits best as a fast first filter when you have many domains to review and need to weed out dead ones.
For the next layer of research, run the domain through a backlink checker to see its link profile, and use a backlink value estimator to weigh whether a link is worth pursuing. If you have a whole shortlist, the bulk domain value checker can compare up to 10 domains at once.
Most surprising results come from entering the wrong thing or from reading a mail warning as a spam verdict.
example.com, not a name followed by an at sign.blog.example.com often has no mail server, so MX, SPF and DMARC Warnings there are normal.For any domain you are serious about, open the site and ask a few plain questions. Does it have original content on one topic? Does it sell links openly? Does it link out to unrelated casino, pharmacy or loan pages? Those answers say more about link quality than any DNS record.
This tool reports what a domain publishes in public records. It is not a backlink database and not a penalty detector.
If your real worry is toxic links pointing at your own site, review them with an anchor text analyzer to spot unnatural patterns. When you decide specific domains should be ignored, the disavow file generator turns them into a file Google accepts. You can find more link research options in the Backlink Tools category.
Enter a domain above and click Check Spam Score to see which signals are Good and which need a second look. Use the table as a quick first filter, then confirm anything important with a manual review and a proper link analysis.
Your report has been submitted. We will look into this issue.
A VPN changes your network exit. It does not guarantee anonymity.
Themes, plugins, code, video, audio, graphics & more from 90,000+ authors.
Web Development
Design & Media
Unlimited Access
Explore Envato MarketThis checklist shows observed records rather than a spam percentage. IPv6-only hosting is valid. MX, SPF and DMARC are relevant to email use, not proof of website quality or backlink risk.
Implementation reviewed: 4 October 2026. Source documentation